The Seven Deadly Sins: Honors Introductory Seminar
HONR 101 – 3 credits
Dr. Philip Whalen (History)
Coastal Carolina University
Philip Whalen, Honors Program Director
Texts:
The “Seven Deadly Sins” course-pack is available electronically via Blackboard
Syllabus
| Date | Topic |
| 22 Aug |
Philip Whalen (History) |
| 27 Aug | Julinna Oxley (Philosophy) Ethics and Virtue: What is a vice? Have read- Gabrielle Taylor, “Vices and Virtue- Theory” in Deadly Vices (selections). |
|
Gluttony
|
|
| 29 Aug |
Philip Whalen (History) - The Gastronomical Turn. |
| 3 Sept |
LABOR DAY HOLIDAY |
| 5 Sept |
Dan Ennis (English) - The Rewards of Gluttony. |
| 10 Sept |
Jen Shinaburger (Technology Instruction) - Tablet PC Computer Instruction |
| 12 Sept |
Shannon Stewart (English) - From What to so What: How to Win Readers and Influence College Professors. Have read |
|
Pride
|
|
| 17 Sept |
Nils Rauhut (Philosophy) - Christianity and the Greeks on Pride. |
| 19 Sept |
Eliza Glaze (History) - Medieval Synthesis of the Sins and Virtues. |
|
24 Sept |
Jaimi Graham (Library Instruction) - Online data research instruction (J-Stor, MUSE) |
| 26 Sept |
Philip Whalen (History) - Discussion of Pride. |
|
Envy
|
|
| 1 Oct |
Gary Stegal (Music) - Envy and the Representation of Emotion in Giacomo Puccini’s “Tosca” |
| 3 Oct | Margaret Fain (Library) - Art-Stor Library Instruction (MEET IN LIBRARY). |
| 8 Oct |
Cheryl-Green Munn (Art) - Representing Vice. |
| 10 Oct |
Cynthia Port (English) Envy in Modern America. |
|
Anger
|
|
| 15 Oct |
Brian Nance (History) - The Renaissance Wellsprings of Vicious Humors. |
| 17 Oct |
Steve Earnest (Theater) The Dramaturgy of Vice. Have read- |
| 22 Oct |
Ken Martin (Theater) Staging Anger across the Ages. |
| 24 Oct |
Philip Whalen (History) Discussion. Have read- |
|
Greed
|
|
| 29 Oct |
Jack Riley (Politics) - The Acquisitive Impulse: From John Locke to Bernard Mandeville. |
| 31 Oct |
Dennis Earl (Philosophy) - Mall Wart. |
| 5 Nov |
Ron Green (Religion) - Greed and Violence in the Bodhisattva Ideal. Have read- |
| 7 Nov | Philip Whalen (History) - Greed in Modern Society. Readings - D. H. Lawrence, “The Rocking-Horse Winner” and listened to Ira Glass, “This American Life” episode (#208) on Office Politics @: http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?episode=208 |
|
Lust
|
|
| 12 Nov |
Maggie Ivanova (English) - Lusting after De Sade. |
| 14 Nov |
Nils Rauhut (Philosophy) - Desire, Creativity and Self-Destruction. |
| 26 Nov |
Michael Ruse (Philosophy) - The Structuring of Desire. |
| 28 Nov | Philip Whalen (History) - Desire’s Gender. Readings - Listen to Ira Glass, “This American Life” episode (#220) on Testosterone @: http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?episode=220 and read “Desire” in Science Times 10 April 2007. |
|
Sloth
|
|
| 3 Dec |
Steve Hamelman (English) - Languor, Liquor and Disillusionment. |
| 5 Dec |
Philip Whalen (History) - Sloth and “The Good Life.” |
| 10 Dec |
Julinna Oxley (Philosophy) - Conclusion: Virtue, Vice or Something Else? |
Grading:
In additional to occasional dialogic reading exercises, students will write 4 (4-5-page) thesis-driven response essays directly related to the course readings and lectures. Students must hand in all assignments on the Monday following the last reading on a particular sin. Late essays will lose one half of a letter grade per day late. This will also apply to papers returned for not properly following the formatting instructions. Also, remember to put your name, course number, and section number on your work. You are responsible for the mechanical and organizational aspects of your essays.
A= This paper is insightful. It addresses the assignment in a way that indicates your comprehension of and control over the assignment itself as well as an understanding of the underlying issues. The message is communicated clearly, concisely, and directly. There is confidence in this writing.
B= This paper meets and, at times, exceeds the basic requirements of the assignment. The paper indicates that you are beginning, at times, to think through and deal with major ideas in the assignment. The message is communicated with generally effective clarity, directness, and conciseness. Some unevenness in writing may be apparent.
C= While the paper offers little insight into the greater issues of the assignment, it meets the basic requirements. The message, for the most part, is reasonably clear, concise, and direct, although there may be unevenness in the writing.
D= The basic requirements of the assignment are partially met; however, additional revision is necessary if you are to communicate the message clearly. There is considerable unevenness in the writing.
F= The assignment’s basic requirements are met only marginally or are not met at all. The writing is not clear, concise, or direct.
Contact person: Philip Whalen, philip_whalen@yahoo.com

