This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
The next issue of JNCHC, vol. 26, no. 2 (deadline: December 15, 2025) invites research essays on any topic of interest to the honors community.
The issue will also include a Forum focused on the theme “Fun in Honors,” in which we invite educators to examine the necessity, purpose, and function of fun and play in honors education and in higher education more generally.
For the Forum, we invite essays of roughly 1000-2000 words that consider this theme in a practical and/or theoretical context. We also invite longer original research pieces on this topic for this issue.
To access the lead essay and the full details of the call for submissions, expand the dropdown below (labeled "Forum Essay Information and Questions to Consider.")
The lead essay for the Forum (available via the button below) is by Ashleen Williams, Instructional Assistant Professor at the University of Mississippi; Edward Munn Sanchez, Dean of the Honors College at the University
of Missouri-St. Louis; and Jonathan Kotinek, Director of the Honors Academy at Texas A&M University.
In “Mostly We’re Fun,” Williams, Sanchez, and Kotinek suggest that now is a particularly important and fruitful time to consider how fun and play figure into honors programming and higher education in general. While
the role of fun and play in education for children has long been widely accepted, researchers in higher education are exploring the effectiveness of play and fun for adult learners across disciplines.
Resisting narratives of instrumental or transactional education and the reduction of higher reeducation to mere job preparation, the authors focus on fun by emphasizing “the opportunity to create lifelong learners
and a future generation equipped to think critically about complex problems that demand nuanced solutions” (pg. 11). Offering definitions of types of fun, the authors help us recognize how education may be fun
in the moment, but may also be fun in retrospect and that fun might come from temporary discomfort, risk-taking, and even the potential for failure. As Williams et al. argue, however, fun is not without risk,
and outsiders might question whether fun is an achievable, assessable, or worthwhile goal of education.
Williams et al. ask a series of important questions for educators to consider:
We have suggested that fun is essential to learning and to the mission of honors, but is it? Does the emphasis on fun devalue or detract from honors education in some way?
Does pedagogical fun have an inherent relationship with joy as we have suggested? What are the limits of conceptualizing fun in this way?
Is fun a universal pedagogical goal? Are some students more receptive to "fun" learning methods than others due to background, educational experience, or expectations?
What is the relationship between fun and seriousness? How can we use that relationship to engage our students in difficult discussions?
Assessment is often considered an essential component of what we do in higher education. Given that, what are the metrics or feedback loops for assessing fun? Is student enjoyment enough?
How do we keep activities we design from being "merely" fun? That is, how do we balance fun with meeting educational objectives and learning outcomes?
How do we keep the type of fun borne of discomfort, risk-taking, and potential failure from sliding into the no fun at all category?
Information about JNCHC—including the editorial policy, submission guidelines, guidelines for abstracts and keywords, and a style sheet—is available on the JNCHC page.
NCHC journals (JNCHC and HIP) and monographs are included in the following electronic databases: ERIC, EBSCO, Gale Cengage, and UNL Digital Commons. Both journals are listed in Cabell International’s Directory
of Publishing Opportunities.
Honors in Practice (HIP)® is now seeking submissions for HIP 22 (2026). HIP accepts articles about innovative practices and integrative, interdisciplinary, and pedagogical issues of interest
to honors educators and other readers in higher education. We are eager to publish scholarly work that records and inspires best practices in honors education.
Submission categories include:
Research Essays
Great Ideas (brief articles about innovative pedagogical practices, courses, projects, ideas, or experiences)
For more information about these formats and their criteria, visit HIP on Scholastica.
The submission deadline for the 2026 issue is March 1.
NCHC journals (JNCHC and HIP) and monographs are included in the following electronic databases: ERIC, EBSCO, Gale Cengage, and UNL Digital Commons. Both journals are listed in Cabell International’s Directory
of Publishing Opportunities.
Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activity (UReCA)®
Open Call for Research and Creative Works Submissions
Submissions Due: June 1, 2025
UReCA: The NCHC Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activity fosters the exchange of intellectual and creative work between undergraduate students, providing a platform where students can engage with and contribute
to the advancement of their individual fields. UReCA is actively accepting submissions for publication. Any student currently enrolled in a bachelor’s or associate’s undergraduate degree program is eligible to submit their
work.
In 2026, the National Collegiate Honors Council (NCHC) will celebrate 50 years of Place as Text, a pioneering experiential learning pedagogy conceived by Bernice Braid in collaboration with NCHC colleagues. As part of the NCHC Monograph
Series, this volume will honor the pedagogy’s legacy, explore its origins and evolution, and chart its future directions.
Since its inception in the 1970s, Place as Text has offered a dynamic framework for integrating intellectual exploration with physical immersion. Rooted in the experiential learning principles championed by Dewey, which
emphasize the transformative power of experience and reflection, Place as Text encourages students to “read” places as texts. By analyzing cultural, historical, social, and ecological elements that shape environments,
students engage deeply with their surroundings. This active, immersive learning experience aligns closely with George Kuh’s concept of High-Impact Practices (HIPs), which promote active learning, student engagement,
and a sense of belonging and purpose. Place as Text exemplifies the essence of community engagement, critical reflection, and cultural empathy—core aims within honors education and higher education in general.
The history of City as Text™ pedagogy is deeply intertwined with the evolution of the Place as Text companion volumes in the NCHC Monograph Series, which has served as a cornerstone for understanding and expanding experiential
learning practices. Each monograph reflects a distinct phase in the pedagogy’s development, capturing its transformative potential for students, faculty, and institutions alike.
The inaugural monograph, Place as Text: Approaches to Active Learning (2000), laid the groundwork for integrating experiential learning into honors education. Bernice Braid and Ada Long presented City as Text™
as a “blueprint” for educators, emphasizing its integrative structure, including field explorations and self-reflective writing. This foundational text established City as Text™ as an adaptable framework for active
learning.
The second monograph, Shatter the Glassy Stare: Implementing Experiential Learning in Higher Education (2008), complemented the first by shifting the focus from student experiences to faculty perspectives, particularly
through Faculty Institutes. This companion volume, edited by Peter Machonis, showcased diverse applications of City as Text™, including its use in campus-based explorations, local neighborhoods, study abroad, and
science courses. It offered practical materials for incorporating these strategies, expanding the pedagogy’s reach across disciplines and contexts.
The third volume was the second edition of Place as Text: Approaches to Active Learning (2010), which was also edited by Bernice Braid and Ada Long. It built upon its predecessor, expanding and clarifying the
original concepts to reflect the growing adoption and adaptation of City as Text™.
In 2014, the fourth monograph, Writing on Your Feet: Reflective Practices in City as Text™, highlighted the centrality of reflective writing to active learning. Ada Long (editor) underscored the importance of
reflection as the “final and necessary step” of the City as Text™ experience, emphasizing its role in deepening students’ understanding of their explorations.
The fifth volume in this strand, Place, Self, Community: City as TextTM in the Twenty-First Century (2021), explored the pedagogy’s capacity to foster integrative learning, emphasizing its ability to generate
a sense of interconnectedness and self-in-context. Bernice Braid described its focus on the “power of structured explorations” and its potential to produce social sensitivity and engagement. Edited by Braid and
Sarah E. Quay, this monograph examined how City as Text™ continues to shape both student and faculty experiences, particularly in addressing complex societal challenges.
This proposed sixth monograph will take a broader analytical perspective, moving beyond the practical applications and reflective practices covered in previous volumes. It will explore how City as Text™ has evolved
into a model for place-based experiential learning across higher education, both within and beyond honors programs. This volume will provide a historical overview of the pedagogy’s 50-year legacy, examining its
impact on experiential learning, community-based education, and interdisciplinary inquiry. Some contributors will likely address how City as Text™ has influenced honors education, the NCHC, regional honors councils,
and higher education at large.
Rather than revisiting the instructional frameworks or reflective writing processes detailed in earlier monographs, this volume will focus on the pedagogy’s broader implications and future potential. It will highlight
how City as Text™ has become a model for fostering critical thinking, cultural empathy, and civic engagement, offering insights into its role as a transformative educational strategy. By reflecting on its past and
envisioning its future, this monograph aims to inspire continued innovation in experiential learning, ensuring that City as Text™ remains a vital tool for addressing the challenges and opportunities of the twenty-first
century.
During an exploration of complex urban spaces, Place as Text encourages students to analyze how environments influence human interaction, a perspective enriched by Sennett’s insights into the social fabric of cities.
Similarly, Bachelard’s personal meanings of places offer a focus that is central to Place as Text’s introspective and observational learning. Benevolo’s examination of European urban development further underscores
the historical and cultural complexities embedded in cities, where physical and symbolic spaces embody societal values and social structures. In this way, Place as Text not only introduces students to spatial dynamics
but also mirrors Kuh’s call for diversity and global learning experiences, helping students to engage meaningfully with diverse cultural perspectives.
Originally conceived within honors education, Place as Text has proven to be a pedagogy that uniquely encourages rigorous intellectual engagement and deep reflection. In 2000, Braid described it as capturing the ethos
of honors education, inspiring students to cross disciplinary and conceptual boundaries in pursuit of critical inquiry. Honors programs and colleges, led by figures such as Fink, Quay, Badenhausen, Frost, and Otero,
have recognized Place as Text’s potential beyond honors, incorporating it into fields such as sociology, environmental studies, and urban planning. With its community-based, inquiry-driven approach, Place as Text
embeds students in real-world contexts, encouraging critical dialogue and underscoring the pedagogy’s role in promoting inquiry, community engagement, and a holistic understanding of place.
As higher education grapples with pressing contemporary issues—sustainability, social justice, and interdisciplinary learning—Place as Text has expanded to address these challenges, drawing from frameworks like Freire’s
vision of education as a pathway to social consciousness. By exploring the social and political implications embedded within spaces, students confront real-world issues such as gentrification, spatial justice, and
socio-economic divides. Foucault’s concept of space as a product of power relations further enriches this approach, allowing students to examine how urban landscapes act as sites of control, resistance, and resilience.
In engaging students with these complexities, Place as Text embodies both Braid’s and Kuh’s principles of diversity, equity, and civic responsibility, offering students a platform to understand and analyze power
structures in tangible ways.
Environmental education within Place as Text emphasizes place-based connections to the ecological impact of human actions, drawing on the work of Orr and Gruenewald. By immersing students in both built and natural environments,
Place as Text promotes sustainability and ecological awareness, resonating with Bachelard’s notion of phenomenological space, where physical experience shapes environmental consciousness. Some contributors to the
volume will likely explore how Place as Text nurtures ecological ethics in students, inspiring them to advocate for sustainable practices—a priority that aligns well with Braid’s vision of engaged, responsible learning.
Furthermore, Place as Text reflects design-thinking principles, as outlined by Brown, emphasizing iterative exploration, empathy, and problem solving. Students are encouraged to observe and reflect on the social needs
of communities, addressing design challenges in ways that align with Schön’s reflective practices and Sennett’s insights into urban dynamics. By empowering students to propose inclusive, community-centered designs,
Place as Text promotes critical engagement with spatial justice and equity, reinforcing the value of collaborative assignments and real-world problem solving as catalysts for meaningful learning.
With advancements in digital technology, Place as Text has evolved to include virtual spaces, expanding the framework’s scope and adapting experiential learning to new contexts. Some contributors may discuss the incorporation
of digital tools to extend Place as Text principles to virtual environments, drawing from theories on digital pedagogy by Selwyn and the global, virtual learning environments examined by Edwards and Usher. This
shift broadens the pedagogy’s applicability, enabling students to explore global issues in a digital context through methods like virtual ethnography, mapping, and building community online. In doing so, Place as
Text emphasizes and heightens the role of technology-enhanced learning as a means of fostering global and digital literacy.
We welcome submissions from educators, administrators, and scholars who want to engage with the theoretical underpinnings of Place as Text. Contributors are encouraged to critically examine the pedagogy’s transformative
capacity, particularly its impact on honors and especially non-honors education, experiential learning, and interdisciplinary inquiry. Prospective authors might consider incorporating theoretical perspectives from
scholars such as Braid, Kuh, Jacobs, Geertz, Kolb, Dewey, Foucault, and Derrida to move beyond anecdotal narratives. We seek contributions that consider the evolution of place-based learning in response to societal
and academic challenges, exploring Place as Text’s role in fostering critical thinking, global awareness, and social responsibility.
This volume aims to offer a comprehensive reflection on the significance of Place as Text within experiential and honors education and to contribute to broader academic conversations within and beyond honors about the
value of place-based learning as a pedagogical model. As an outward-facing volume, it seeks to initiate dialogue between honors educators and scholars across disciplines, advancing conversations on the role of place-based
experiential learning in higher education. Reflecting on the next fifty years, we invite contributors to consider how this pedagogical model can evolve and inspire future generations of learners to approach the
world as an interconnected web of experiences, places, and ideas.
Historical Foundations: Investigate the origins of Place as Text, tracing its development from a place-based learning tool in honors education to an adaptable model for diverse settings, including urban,
rural, and digital environments.
Theoretical Frameworks: Engage with key theories that inform Place as Text such as Foucault’s power dynamics of space, Lefebvre’s spatial justice, and Derrida’s deconstruction, examining how various concepts
intersect with experiential learning and interdisciplinary education.
Place as Text as a High-Impact Practice: Examine how Place as Text aligns with Kuh’s framework for High-Impact Practices, emphasizing experiential learning, diversity, and civic engagement. Consider how Place
as Text promotes student engagement and learning outcomes both within honors education and in broader contexts.
Social Justice and Equity: Explore how Place as Text encourages students to engage with social issues like gentrification, economic disparity, and spatial justice, reflecting critical pedagogy frameworks
such as Freire’s concept of education for social awareness.
Environmental Education and Sustainability: Analyze applications of Place as Text in fostering environmental responsibility, drawing on insights from Orr and Gruenewald on place-based learning to enhance
students’ awareness of ecological ethics and sustainability.
Design Thinking and Community Engagement: Discuss how Place as Text aligns with design thinking and reflective practices, encouraging students to develop community-centered, empathetic approaches to spatial
challenges, perhaps informed by Schön’s and Sennett’s emphasis on urban dynamics.
Digital and Virtual Adaptations: Examine the expansion of Place as Text into virtual spaces, exploring how digital platforms support experiential learning and enable place-based education in online and global
contexts, with insights from digital pedagogy theorists such as Selwyn.
Comparative International Perspectives: Reflect on the adaptation of Place as Text in international settings, considering how concepts from Benevolo on the European city and cross-cultural insights can enrich
place-based learning experiences outside the U.S.
Honors Education and Pedagogical Innovation: Consider the role of Place as Text in honors programs, focusing on its capacity to foster critical thinking, interdisciplinary inquiry, and global awareness, essential
components of honors and non-honors education.
Future Directions and Innovations: Speculate on the future of Place as Text as a flexible pedagogical model, exploring its potential evolution to meet challenges posed by climate change, digital transformation,
and the globalization of education.
Bachelard, Gaston. The Poetics of Space. Translated by Maria Jolas, reprint ed., Beacon Press, 1994.
Benevolo, Leonardo. The European City. Translated by Carl Ipsen, Wiley-Blackwell, 1995.
Braid, Bernice, and Ada Long, editors. Place as Text: Approaches to Active Learning. 2nd ed., National Collegiate Honors Council, 2010.
Braid, Bernice, and Sara E. Quay, editors. Place, Self, Community: City as TextTM in the Twenty-First Century. National Collegiate Honors Council, 2021.
Brown, Tim. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Business, 2009.
Derrida, Jacques. Writing and Difference. Translated by Alan Bass, U of Chicago P, 1980.
Dewey, John. Experience and Education. Free Press, 1997. Originally published 1938.
Edwards, Richard, and Robin Usher. Globalisation and Pedagogy: Space, Place, and Identity. 2nd ed., Routledge, 2007.
Foucault, Michel. “Of Other Spaces.” Translated by Jay Miskowiec, Diacritics, vol. 16, no. 1 (1986): 22-27.
Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Translated by Myra Bergman Ramos, 30th Anniversary Edition, Continuum, 2000.
Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books, 1973.
Gruenewald, David A. “The Best of Both Worlds: A Critical Pedagogy of Place.” Educational Researcher, vol. 32, no. 4 (2003): 3–12.
Jacobs, Jane. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House, 1961.
Kolb, David A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, 1983.
Kuh, George. High-Impact Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter. American Association of Colleges and Universities, 2008.
Lefebvre, Henri. The Production of Space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith, Blackwell, 1992.
Long, Ada, editor. Writing on Your Feet: Reflective Practices in City as Text™, A Tribute to the Career of Bernice Braid. National Collegiate Honors Council, 2014.
Machonis, Peter, editor. Shatter the Glassy Stare: Implementing Experiential Learning in Higher Education. National Collegiate Honors Council, 2000.
Orr, David W. Ecological Literacy: Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World. State U of New York P, 1991.
Schön, Donald A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, 1984.
Selwyn, Neil. Digital Technology and the Contemporary University: Degrees of Digitization. Routledge, 2014.
Sennett, Richard. The Uses of Disorder: Personal Identity and City Life. Alfred A. Knopf, 1970. Knopf, 1970.
The Publications Board is interested in receiving manuscripts on diverse topics in honors education and urges people with expertise interested in writing such a monograph to submit a prospectus.
Questions about the Monograph Series and prospectus submissions can be directed to Dr. Jeffrey A. Portnoy at monographs@nchchonors.org.